Without the tumblers being set to a given starting location (usually the 'clear' position) it isn't even a 'game of mathematices' at least the way I understand it, it's a mission of probable futility.Moreover, one may be able to determine (say) all 3-4 interim tumbler locations randomly with relative ease, but what about the intervening 'locating spins'. If not, a 'death trap' may lie therein for the unsuspecting or unknoing, using a random approach. At least the way I read your (now unseen) latest post, you seem to imply that the safe tumblers have been already been 'cleared' to start, but don't say so implicitly. Roger -It appears as though you may have deleted your latest post, but as an amateur safe hobbiest, let me add the following.
#Old mosler safe combination help how to
How To Crack An Old Mosler Safe For Sale.Since I was merely generating random numbers and not storing and checking against numbers I had already tried, I might never have gotten the right number.My point is, it would be fun to build a Stamp powered device to do it, but don't expect any results beyone the satisfaction of having built the device.▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔Roger PiersonSenior Electronics TechnicainDTI Assoicates. Second, number of combination possibilies are staggering, with that slow thing it would have taken me years to get it right. After a while, the alignment would drift and the number ordered would not match up to what was dialed. To start with, it was difficult to calibrate the robot to the dial position acurrately enough. These little things had tiny servos and robotic components that would interface to a PC and were programed with tinyBASIC, a subset of BASIC.Anyway, I wrote a program to generate random number combinations and spin the dial and a motorized arm would put some tension on the shackle to see if it moved. Back in '93 I tried to crack a combination lock using the robotics kits we had in my High School computer lab.